

I no longer get excited about a new Veritasium video.
I also don’t get excited when the title and thumbnail change 5 times in a week.


I no longer get excited about a new Veritasium video.
I also don’t get excited when the title and thumbnail change 5 times in a week.


About as big a difference as you can get - Kuiper belt to low earth orbit


Lol yeah halo is meant to be scripted, choreographed action sequences - not final mission just banshee past everything happening on the ground.


Spoilers?: My biggest gripe too…I finished it, and the ending I chose felt like a 20 min long unskippable cut scene. Never mind the actual 20min long unskippable cut scene in the middle.
In case anyone is interested, there’s a powertoy called file locksmith that will show what’s using it and let you kill it: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/powertoys/file-locksmith


Did he just spend the first half of the article explaining why ‘copilot in excel’ (not agent mode) wasn’t designed for calculation tasks, them finishes with complaining that on benchmarks it fails 80% of the time?
The 54% accuracy of agent mode should be called out, not the low accuracy of the thing that wasn’t designed for it.


I feel like you could set the clock to birds here sometimes - Wake up = all the little birds, lorikeets
Lunchtime= plovers, as people navigate around them
Arvo= cockies and corellas
Evening = not a bird, but fruit bats
Random time during the middle of the night= the blood curdling scream of the curlews.
Australia being a famous axis power
Ramirez!


Of course I read it, and investigated the source. The issue is with the title the article chose.


The title is ‘internet’, implying a network of networks. The title wasn’t ‘new record in data transmission speed’.


The actual source: www.nict.go.jp
Not really an ‘internet’ world speed record, but really a wired data transmission record if I’m reading correctly.


I love how they went into so much detail about why the old numbers would be accurate, then proceed to say they can ‘safely’ say that windows has lost 400 million users over a sentence on a blog stating windows has ‘over a billion users’.


No source for the blog post. Here it is: windows blog
Note that the number has been updated, and at the bottom they state that that figure has been updated.
The original text said ‘over a billion’. 1.4 billion is over a billion.
You can’t just jump to the future, so use this one for the next decade:
