Oh, no worries - I don’t like him, I don’t like twitch streamers generally 👍 I think he’s untalented. Saying loads of people like him doesn’t really prove that he’s talented, does it? Plenty of people like all kinds of things.

35 is young.

My pointing out that he needs attention for an income was more about how it feels like he’s creating rage bait to get engagement in recent months (his pivot to saying outrageous and inflammatory political things etc ).

I don’t like him. I do also think he’s untalented and unintelligent and young.

Oh shit no wait, I’ll take one million dollars, and that’s my FINAL offer!

I’d do it for free, as I did yesterday lunchtime, but if you want to pay me I’ll take whatever! Altho I see you’ve mentioned the soup is just below 100C which just seems like you’re gonna burn your mouth pretty badly no matter what you’re watching lol - maybe if I can let it cool down to normal temperature?

No, he doesn’t. He’s a very untalented and unintelligent young man who needs attention to have an income; this rag is giving him that attention. I’m part of the problem by commenting on it, and I’m not even spreading any awareness that this man makes money through clicks so will act out for those clicks because it’s something we all know.

Oh, I see. Yeah that’s fair, the guy’s a fucking lunatic.

Am I being dense here? I thought this was just medical info, not like… Anything weird or sexual (in a non-medical sense)?

I’m not saying he’s correct, and I certainly loathe the brain-worm ridden freak, but saying it’s “not appropriate” for the Secretary of Health to know if something concerning is happening with sperm count seems a bit hyperbolic.

Oh true, lemme just saddle up and fix the US economy myself 👍

Internet’s dead folks, time to get back to the real world! 🥳

We’re fucked. No point being scared of something we have no control over. A few rich men will come out of this ahead, and the rest of us will fight over the scraps, lose our homes, and starve. 🤷‍♂️

Haha wow they made the robot call him gay what a sick burn! Grooooosssss!!! Thank god this man who got famous via “negative” publicity definitely isn’t still doing that!!! Great job, Futurism!!!

Stupid outlet. Stupid story. Stupid person. Stupid technology. This man gets richer and gets the attention he wants. Journalists need to have a bit of a think before they start typing.

I’m totally in favour of solving multiple problems at once.

Personally, I do not view this as a problem. My issue is with the EU Parliament wasting time with this in place of anything that I perceive as an actual problem.

If you think that calling veggie burgers “burgers” is a problem worth their time and effort, more power to you 👍

Haha yeah awesome real problems getting solved by serious politicians here, guys! If you can actually get your hands on any real meat without paying an arm and a leg for it what the actual fuck are we doing here lads what the fuck are these fucking politicians doing???

The world is on fire, the economy is in the shitter globally, there are multiple ongoing genocides, facism is on the rise again, and we’re wiggling our dicks around talking about whether you can call veggie burgers “burgers”? Are you serious? WHO CARES???

Is this bring your kid to work day and they let the kids do a vote for a change instead as a treat? Is this a joke?? What motherfucker is getting into politics to make sure “hey those damn vegans better not call anything a burger”.

These poncy little briefcase-botherers need a hobby or something because this is absolutely the biggest case of dicking around on the job I’ve ever heard of. Ridiculous. Stupid. A joke. Pathetic. Childish. Vapid. Can we get some adults in the EU Parliament please?

I think ‘master’ is fine for the master branch. It’s a master copy of the codebase.

I think ‘main’ is fine for the main branch. It’s the main branch of the repo.

I use ‘main’ at work cos that’s what my git client defaults to. I use ‘master’ at home because that’s what my git client defaults to. 🤷‍♂️

Being slightly wrong in a translation is bad, for sure, but doesn’t (often) invent new facts. I still would not trust it for a legal document, personally.

I did actually originally ask what your point was in the comment I wrote, but I couldn’t phrase it in a way that didn’t feel hostile - which I hope I’m not coming across as. I just couldn’t quite grasp the point you were trying to make, and I think it’s because we disagree on a fundamental level here.

Yes if they’re signing a contract, absolutely get a lawyer if you don’t understand what you’re signing, but occasionally you just need to look up a law or accept a eula, and it would be nice to be able to have some help reading it, even if it’s from an imperfect tool.

I agree with the first part about signing a contract, but totally disagree with the second. If I need to look up a law, or anything at all, I would never run it through a machine that regularly invents “facts” from whole cloth, or misinterprets, while agreeing and confidently backing any implications I give it. LLMs are inherently untrustworthy, in my opinion, partly because they’re programmed to be “yes-men” who engage the user constantly in order to sell them a service, and partly because they don’t “know” anything - they just essentially scrape the web and then uncritically mash whatever they find together and return it in convincing natural language.

I think they are dangerous to engage with at any level.

The reason you ask a lawyer and not an LLM if you can’t understand the original document is because LLMs regularly misinterpret and hallucinate, and you might have no way to verify that what it says is true.

The LLM doesn’t know things. It isn’t “the key” or “the answer”. I don’t think this user is talking about translating a legal document from another actual language or anything.

Hey how’d you get your hands on my code

deleted by creator

It’s ‘case in point’, by the way.