Lindsey fucking Graham gets no leeway from me
Lindsey fucking Graham gets no leeway from me
What if she’s a double agent for the democratic party? An antifa plant meant to flip republican seats for the coming of the second anti-christ after Donald Trump defeated Hillary.
I kinda like this idea. Publicly accessible USPS chargers and profits are rolled directly back into their budget IN ADDITION TO current funding.
The US has over 160,000 miles of rail. That $6B is just $37,500 per mile and doesn’t take into account money needed to update/upgrade stations and crossings.
St. Louis to Chicago is a very, very flat 260 miles. To buy an Amtrak ticket it’s $36-43 and takes 5h.
I’m traveling to Italy soon and a ticket from Genoa to Rome is €35, about the same distance between a sea front and a mountain range, and takes a whole hour less travel time.
Amtrak is in desperate need of public funding and freight rail needs to be prosecuted for blatantly ignoring laws that give passenger trains the right of way on rails.
Sorry, but once you’re so filthy rich you can own and operate a private jet, you lose the right two things:
You think that the circles she moves in aren’t aware of what she’s doing? They encourage it.
I was born in the back half of the 90’s and can confidently say that you’re wrong. Sharing information existed long before the Internet and cell phones.
And welcome to the jam
Say it with me. We don’t negotiate with terrorists.
You can be held in contempt for anything disruptive, so if it’s deliberate and can be proven then yes.
I wish we could vote to quarantine people into labeled sections of Lemmy. Everytime Biden does something that represents positive change there’s an influx of begging choosers saying that “he didn’t do enough” or “but what about this!”. He’s cancelled 153 billion with a B dollars in 4 years without having a majority in congress. That’s an exceptional accomplishment. May I remind everyone how much debt on middle class Americans were forgiven of under Trump or Bush or Reagan?
Biden is up against the most conservative and corrupt Supreme Court panel in history and a republican party that is so determined to torpedo anything that comes to the floor that they booted out their speaker of the house for coming to an agreement on the budget and replaced him with a speaker that they’re threatening to replace for nearly coming to a deal with democrats that would enable the US, for the first time in history, to close it’s borders. The only thing wrong with it was that it took away their boogeyman to campaign on.
Yeah, I’m not hopping onboard that opinion. If you expose yourself in a sexual manner(despite trying to be discreet) in a theater filled with people, you deserve to be labeled a sex offender. There could be children in the crowd or working as ushers.
There’s already way too many stories of men and to a lesser extent women exposing themselves to people in public.
TIL. Thanks for the info. I had no idea that was even a thing til now
From page 25 of this presentation:
A graphic shows a Trump post on Truth social that reads.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut pretium pretium tempor. Ut eget imperdiet neque.
Which google translates to:
The customer is very important, the customer will be followed by the customer. In order to pay the price in time. It does not need financing.
They even mentioned that they estimated 15M monetized users and 10M recurring media subscriptions. So they’re estimating $1.2B per year for the next 3 years of those 25M users. That’s $48/mo between those 2 types of subscriptions. In the presentation they directly compared themselves to Twitter who charges $11/mo and Netflix, Apple, Disney+, and Amazon who all charge between $4.99 and $8.99 per month for basic service.
That’s AT MOST $20/mo if all of those users paid for both. Which they dont even claim. So a competitive price for a Twitter blue alternative would net them ~$180M and ~$100M from media subscriptions. Where in the world are they getting the other $920M in their projections?
Depends. I have enough in savings to cover the cost, sure, but there’s only enough in savings because I’ve been transferring about 25% of my paycheck to savings for the past 2 years in order to afford a wedding/honeymoon. So I’d just be pushing myself into a larger credit debt after the bills come due for the wedding services.
So he’s essentially inviting the state of New York to perform a super mega audit of his finances. Got it.
Can you explain what you mean by the 2nd paragraph? Could that put him in legal trouble for the motion his lawyers filed to the court that claimed it was “impossible” for him to secure enough cash to cover bond?
No no no. You don’t get to just use italian whenever you want to veil your shithead sense of self worth. You leave a romance language out of this and put that shit in plain English.